1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CXM Direct vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CXM Direct (CXM Direct LLC) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- CXM Direct 6D Score
- 7.0
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CXM Direct outranks Magic Compass by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.7)
On supervisory breadth, CXM Direct holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CXM Direct | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 6.7 | +0.3 | CXM Direct |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 4.2 | +2.8 | CXM Direct |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | CXM Direct |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 6.8 | +0.2 | CXM Direct |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | CXM Direct |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CXM Direct vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CXM Direct | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CXM Direct LLC | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Office No. 518 Signature by Regus, 15 St Helen's Place, London, EC3A 6DQ, United Kingdom | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CXM Direct and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CXM Direct vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CXM Direct or Magic Compass?
CXM Direct holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, CXM Direct maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CXM Direct and Magic Compass?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CXM Direct records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do CXM Direct and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CXM Direct lists Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios with execution software [MT4], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CXM Direct or Magic Compass?
CXM Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.