1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Change vs CXM Direct: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Change (Change) and CXM Direct (CXM Direct LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Change 6D Score
- 5.0
- CXM Direct 6D Score
- 7.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CXM Direct outranks Change by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Change holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CXM Direct holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Change | CXM Direct | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | CXM Direct |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | CXM Direct |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | CXM Direct |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | CXM Direct |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 7.0 | +2.0 | CXM Direct |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Change vs CXM Direct
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Change | CXM Direct |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Change | CXM Direct LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | AFM: Not suppliedEstonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB): #FVT000072 | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | EE | Office No. 518 Signature by Regus, 15 St Helen's Place, London, EC3A 6DQ, United Kingdom |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Change and CXM Direct against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Change vs CXM Direct
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Change or CXM Direct?
Both Change and CXM Direct hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Change maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (AFM, Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CXM Direct maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission, Mauritius, Financial Conduct Authority (UK FCA)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Change and CXM Direct?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Change records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with CXM Direct at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).
How do Change and CXM Direct differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Change lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CXM Direct lists Currency pairs, indices, stocks, commodities and cryptocurrencies, energy, EU, US stocks, portfolios with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Change or CXM Direct?
Change carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CXM Direct carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.