30-Jurisdiction Statutory Audit • South Korea (KR)
Is Blockpit Regulated in South Korea? (FSC Compliance Audit)
Deterministic regulatory audit of Blockpit (Blockpit GmbH) against South Korea's national supervisor (Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS)), statutory investor compensation limits, and retail margin rules.
Coverage: South Korea (KR) • Supervisor: FSC (Tier-1 Onshore)
- Local FSC Filings
- 0
- Total Global Licences
- 0
- 6D Overall Score
- 2.5
- Regime Classification
- Tier-1
Switch National Jurisdiction Audit (30 Statutory Regimes)
← Back to Blockpit Main DossierSouth Korea (FSC) Statutory Compliance Matrix for Blockpit
Side-by-side comparison of South Korea's statutory requirements against Blockpit's recorded filings.
| Statutory Dimension | South Korea (FSC) Mandate | Blockpit Recorded Standing |
|---|---|---|
| National Supervisory Authority | Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) (FSC) | No Active Licence Recorded |
| Local Certificate Number(s) | Mandatory registration on official FSC public register | None recorded in South Korea |
| Statutory Investor Compensation Cap | KRW 50,000,000 KDIC (Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation for cash balances) | Not covered by South Korea domestic scheme when onboarded offshore |
| Retail Leverage & Margin Cap | 10:1 Retail FX Margin (10% minimum initial margin under FSCMA) | Governed by foreign/offshore subsidiary contract terms |
| Client Money Segregation Rule | FSCMA Mandatory Korea Securities Finance Corporation (KSFC) Client Deposit Custody | Verify daily trust reconciliation & negative balance protection in client agreement |
Blockpit — South Korea (FSC) Compliance Exhibit
Deterministic vector diagram of local licensing, investor protection, and leverage constraints.
Top 5 Regulated Peers for South Korea (FSC) Comparison
Benchmark Blockpit against peer institutions in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
| Institution | Recorded Licences | 6D Score | Risk Classification | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitpanda | BaFinAMFFI | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Capex | CYSECCNMVFSCA | 6.5 | Risk level not supplied | |
| Change | AFMEstonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| UniCredit Bulbank | Financial Supervision CommissionBulgarian National Bank (BNB) | 5.0 | Risk level not supplied | |
| SwissBorg | Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)AMF | 4.0 | Risk level not supplied |
Blockpit in South Korea (FSC): Frequently Asked Questions
Statutory licensing, compensation cap, and leverage answers.
Is Blockpit regulated in South Korea by FSC?
Our dataset currently holds 0 local FSC licences and 0 active foreign regulated licences for Blockpit. Residents of South Korea should verify primary authorisation directly on the FSC public register before transacting.
What is the investor compensation limit for South Korea residents using Blockpit?
Because Blockpit does not hold a recorded local FSC licence in our current snapshot, South Korea's domestic statutory compensation scheme (KRW 50,000,000 KDIC (Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation for cash balances)) does not cover accounts opened with Blockpit's foreign or offshore subsidiaries.
What retail leverage cap and margin rules apply in South Korea (FSC)?
Financial Services Commission / Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) (FSC) enforces the following retail leverage and margin standard in South Korea: 10:1 Retail FX Margin (10% minimum initial margin under FSCMA), alongside client asset protection rules requiring FSCMA Mandatory Korea Securities Finance Corporation (KSFC) Client Deposit Custody.
Which regulated alternatives to Blockpit hold licences in South Korea or comparable tiers?
Comparable institutions in this directory include Bitpanda (5.0/10, 4 filings), Capex (6.5/10, 3 filings), Change (5.0/10, 2 filings), UniCredit Bulbank (5.0/10, 2 filings), SwissBorg (4.0/10, 2 filings). Use the 1v1 Compare links in the table above to benchmark Blockpit against each peer.
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.