Institution record
bitkub
- Source score
- 5.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing bitkub against peer institutions in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bitkub (this record) | SEC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 |
BaFinAMFFI+1 | 4 / 4 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
CYSECCNMVFSCA | 3 / 3 | Risk level not supplied | 6.5 | 0 | |
AFMEstonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Financial Supervision CommissionBulgarian National Bank (BNB) | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 5.0 | 0 | |
Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)AMF | 1 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | 4.0 | 0 |
bitkub: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is bitkub's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, bitkub (legal entity reference: bitkub) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official SEC public register.
Which of bitkub's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
bitkub is tracked under our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe coverage scope based on its institutional service profile (Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (SEC) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is bitkub's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
bitkub carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 5.0, risk & licensing: 5.0, brand: 5.0, market influence: 5.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to bitkub's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with bitkub, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to SEC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from Euro Firm Ledger relevant to bitkub's supervisory scope.
EEA Passporting
CySEC Cypriot Investment Firm (CIF) Licensing: Capital Tiers, ICF Levies, and Pan-European Marketing
Evaluating how online multi-asset brokers structure operations in Limassol and Nicosia to distribute retail investment products across the European Union.
eu-supervision
EU MiCA Article 75 Custody Liability & DORA Major ICT Incident Reporting Applied to the $6.3B Exchange Breach
Evaluating the $6.3 billion Binance security breach through the lens of European Union Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Article 75 custody liability and DORA major ICT incident notification mandates.
mifid-mica-passports
EU MiFID II Passport & MiCA CASP National Competent Register: 2026 Definitive Institutional Guide, Quantitative Benchmarks & Regulatory Audit
Definitive 2026 flagship cornerstone guide to EU MiFID II Passport & MiCA CASP National Competent Register on Euro Firm Roll (eurofirmledger.com). Covers European Economic Area (ESMA / BaFin / AMF / CySEC) & Switzerland (FINMA) statutory rules, Tier-1 quantitative benchmarks, mathematical formulation (EU-MIFID2-MICA-ROLL), and compliance verification.
EEA Passporting
Continental European Firm Roll: Auditing 564 EEA & Swiss Financial Institutions Across MiFID II and MiCA Passports
Tracking how investment firms and digital asset service providers headquartered in Germany, Cyprus, France, Switzerland, and the Netherlands deploy EEA passports.