Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

OpenFX vs PJSC Sberbank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of OpenFX (Open Investments LLC) and PJSC Sberbank (PJSC Sberbank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

OpenFX 6D Score
5.0
PJSC Sberbank 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: openfx-vs-pjsc-sberbank

OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, OpenFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightOpenFXPJSC SberbankScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: OpenFX vs PJSC Sberbank

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: OpenFX vs PJSC Sberbank
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeOpenFXPJSC Sberbank
Primary Legal NameOpen Investments LLCPJSC Sberbank
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
NBRB: Not supplied
Registered Domicile / Address220116, 104 Dzerzhinsky Ave., Suite 803B Minsk, Belarus19 Vavilova St., 117997 Moscow, Russia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesretail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese, English, RussianEnglish, Russian
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: OpenFX vs PJSC Sberbank

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: OpenFX or PJSC Sberbank?

Both OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, OpenFX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), OpenFX records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PJSC Sberbank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do OpenFX and PJSC Sberbank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

OpenFX lists general financial services with execution software [MT4], while PJSC Sberbank lists retail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: OpenFX or PJSC Sberbank?

OpenFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PJSC Sberbank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

OpenFX vs PJSC Sberbank (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger