1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
NessFx vs OpenFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of NessFx (FXNET Limited) and OpenFX (Open Investments LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- NessFx 6D Score
- 5.0
- OpenFX 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
NessFx and OpenFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, NessFx holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas OpenFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | NessFx | OpenFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.7 | 5.0 | +0.3 | OpenFX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: NessFx vs OpenFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | NessFx | OpenFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FXNET Limited | Open Investments LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 4 Theklas Lysioti St, Harmony House Office 31, 3rd Floor, 3030 Limassol, Cyprus | 220116, 104 Dzerzhinsky Ave., Suite 803B Minsk, Belarus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex (more than 45 currency pairs), precious metals, commodities, stocks, indices and bonds | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare NessFx and OpenFX against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: NessFx vs OpenFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: NessFx or OpenFX?
Both NessFx and OpenFX hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, NessFx maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas OpenFX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between NessFx and OpenFX?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), NessFx records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.7, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with OpenFX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do NessFx and OpenFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
NessFx lists Forex (more than 45 currency pairs), precious metals, commodities, stocks, indices and bonds with execution software [MT4], while OpenFX lists general financial services with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: NessFx or OpenFX?
NessFx carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while OpenFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.