1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs SM CAPITAL MARKETS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and SM CAPITAL MARKETS (SM CAPITAL MARKETS Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- SM CAPITAL MARKETS 6D Score
- 4.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Magic Compass outranks SM CAPITAL MARKETS by +2.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SM CAPITAL MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | SM CAPITAL MARKETS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 4.0 | +2.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 4.0 | +0.2 | Magic Compass |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 4.0 | +2.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Magic Compass |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs SM CAPITAL MARKETS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | SM CAPITAL MARKETS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | SM CAPITAL MARKETS Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | Gladstonos 69, Acropolis Center 5th Floor 3040 Limassol Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | FX, indices, futures, spot energy, metals, shares, cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETF |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, English, German |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and SM CAPITAL MARKETS against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs SM CAPITAL MARKETS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or SM CAPITAL MARKETS?
Both Magic Compass and SM CAPITAL MARKETS hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SM CAPITAL MARKETS maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and SM CAPITAL MARKETS?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SM CAPITAL MARKETS at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Magic Compass and SM CAPITAL MARKETS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SM CAPITAL MARKETS lists FX, indices, futures, spot energy, metals, shares, cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETF with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or SM CAPITAL MARKETS?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SM CAPITAL MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.