1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- SCDEX 6D Score
- 9.3
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SCDEX outranks Magic Compass by +2.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.7)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | SCDEX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 9.3 | +2.6 | SCDEX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 9.5 | +5.3 | SCDEX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 9.3 | +5.3 | SCDEX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 9.2 | +9.2 | SCDEX |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 9.4 | +2.6 | SCDEX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 9.1 | +4.1 | SCDEX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs SCDEX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | SCDEX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Low risk |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | 1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs SCDEX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or SCDEX?
Magic Compass holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and SCDEX?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).
How do Magic Compass and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or SCDEX?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.