1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Magic Compass vs PT.Java Global Futures: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) and PT.Java Global Futures (PT.Java Global Futures) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- PT.Java Global Futures 6D Score
- 4.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Magic Compass outranks PT.Java Global Futures by +2.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PT.Java Global Futures holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Magic Compass | PT.Java Global Futures | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.7 | 4.0 | +2.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.2 | 4.0 | +0.2 | Magic Compass |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 2.0 | +2.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.8 | 4.0 | +2.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Magic Compass |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Magic Compass vs PT.Java Global Futures
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Magic Compass | PT.Java Global Futures |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Magic Compass Ltd | PT.Java Global Futures |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus | Foresta Business Loft 5 Unit 15 Jl. BSD Boulevard, Lengkong Kulon Pagedangan Tangerang Banten 15331 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality | Currency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Indonesian, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Magic Compass and PT.Java Global Futures against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Magic Compass vs PT.Java Global Futures
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Magic Compass or PT.Java Global Futures?
Both Magic Compass and PT.Java Global Futures hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Magic Compass maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PT.Java Global Futures maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Magic Compass and PT.Java Global Futures?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Magic Compass records an Overall Score of 6.7 (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with PT.Java Global Futures at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do Magic Compass and PT.Java Global Futures differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PT.Java Global Futures lists Currency pairs, metals, energies, Asian stocks and more with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Magic Compass or PT.Java Global Futures?
Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PT.Java Global Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.