1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
INPAY vs PJSC Sberbank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of INPAY (Inpay A/S) and PJSC Sberbank (PJSC Sberbank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- INPAY 6D Score
- 5.0
- PJSC Sberbank 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
INPAY and PJSC Sberbank are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, INPAY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | INPAY | PJSC Sberbank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: INPAY vs PJSC Sberbank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | INPAY | PJSC Sberbank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Inpay A/S | PJSC Sberbank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | NBRB: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Kalvebod Brygge 45, 1560 Copenhagen V, Denmark | 19 Vavilova St., 117997 Moscow, Russia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | retail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare INPAY and PJSC Sberbank against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: INPAY vs PJSC Sberbank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: INPAY or PJSC Sberbank?
Both INPAY and PJSC Sberbank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, INPAY maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (DFSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between INPAY and PJSC Sberbank?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), INPAY records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PJSC Sberbank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do INPAY and PJSC Sberbank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
INPAY lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PJSC Sberbank lists retail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: INPAY or PJSC Sberbank?
INPAY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PJSC Sberbank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.