1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Gold Fun vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Gold Fun (Gold Fun Corporation Ltd) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Gold Fun 6D Score
- 5.0
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Magic Compass outranks Gold Fun by +1.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Gold Fun holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Gold Fun | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.7 | +1.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.2 | +0.8 | Gold Fun |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Magic Compass |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.8 | +1.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Gold Fun vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Gold Fun | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Gold Fun Corporation Ltd | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Sung On Street 18 Peninsula Square 15/F Room 1508 Hong Kong Kowloon Hung Hom Tak Fung Street 18 Harbourfront Landmark Tower 1 26/F Room 2610 | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Smelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore gold | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional) | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Gold Fun and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Gold Fun vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Gold Fun or Magic Compass?
Both Gold Fun and Magic Compass hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Gold Fun maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CGSE) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Gold Fun and Magic Compass?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Gold Fun records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Gold Fun and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Gold Fun lists Smelting services, diamond jewelry, 12kg gold ingots, pure gold bars, real-time trading software, gold futures, storage services, tailor-made transactions, GF gold trading, gold investment, ore gold with execution software [MT5], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Gold Fun or Magic Compass?
Gold Fun carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.