Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUTU vs SwissBorg: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUTU (Futu Holding Limited) and SwissBorg (SwissBorg SA) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

FUTU 6D Score
7.7
SwissBorg 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: futu-vs-swissborg

FUTU outranks SwissBorg by +3.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.7 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUTU holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SwissBorg holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUTUSwissBorgScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.74.0+3.7FUTU
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.74.0+3.7FUTU
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight5.02.0+3.0FUTU
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.54.0+3.5FUTU
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.94.0+3.9FUTU

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUTU vs SwissBorg

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUTU vs SwissBorg
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUTU and SwissBorg.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUTUSwissBorg
Primary Legal NameFutu Holding LimitedSwissBorg SA
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressG/F, 96 Nathan Road, Tsim Sha Tsui, Kowloon (go right from Exit B1 of Tsim Sha Tsui MTR Station, opposite The ONE).Rue du Grand-Chêne 8, Lausanne, Vaud 1003, Switzerland
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStocksMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUTU and SwissBorg against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUTU vs SwissBorg

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUTU or SwissBorg?

Both FUTU and SwissBorg hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FUTU maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SwissBorg maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB), AMF) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUTU and SwissBorg?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUTU records an Overall Score of 7.7 (Risk & Licensing: 7.7, Brand: 7.5, Market Influence: 7.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with SwissBorg at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do FUTU and SwissBorg differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUTU lists Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SwissBorg lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUTU or SwissBorg?

FUTU carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SwissBorg carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUTU vs SwissBorg (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger