1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FTM Brokers vs PJSC Sberbank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FTM Brokers (FTM Brokers LLC) and PJSC Sberbank (PJSC Sberbank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- FTM Brokers 6D Score
- 6.0
- PJSC Sberbank 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FTM Brokers outranks PJSC Sberbank by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, FTM Brokers holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FTM Brokers | PJSC Sberbank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | FTM Brokers |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | FTM Brokers |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | FTM Brokers |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | FTM Brokers |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FTM Brokers vs PJSC Sberbank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FTM Brokers | PJSC Sberbank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FTM Brokers LLC | PJSC Sberbank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | NBRB: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | 19 Vavilova St., 117997 Moscow, Russia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currency pairs, gold and silver, crude oil, natural gas and securities | retail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Russian | English, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FTM Brokers and PJSC Sberbank against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FTM Brokers vs PJSC Sberbank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FTM Brokers or PJSC Sberbank?
Both FTM Brokers and PJSC Sberbank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FTM Brokers maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PJSC Sberbank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (NBRB) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FTM Brokers and PJSC Sberbank?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FTM Brokers records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with PJSC Sberbank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FTM Brokers and PJSC Sberbank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FTM Brokers lists Currency pairs, gold and silver, crude oil, natural gas and securities with execution software [MT4], while PJSC Sberbank lists retail banking, corporate banking, financial and insurance services, investment banking, mortgages, private banking, private equity, savings, securities, asset management, wealth management, credit cards with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FTM Brokers or PJSC Sberbank?
FTM Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PJSC Sberbank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.