1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FOCUS MARKETS vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FOCUS MARKETS (Focus Markets Pty Ltd) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- FOCUS MARKETS 6D Score
- 6.0
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Magic Compass outranks FOCUS MARKETS by +0.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.7 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, FOCUS MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FOCUS MARKETS | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 6.7 | +0.7 | Magic Compass |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 4.2 | +1.8 | FOCUS MARKETS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.8 | +1.8 | Magic Compass |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FOCUS MARKETS vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FOCUS MARKETS | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Focus Markets Pty Ltd | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | FOCUS MARKETS PTY LTD, 'Rialto South Tower' Level 35, 525 Collins Street MELBOURNE VIC 3000 | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs on currency pairs, indices, commodities, stocks | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Traditional), Vietnamese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FOCUS MARKETS and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FOCUS MARKETS vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FOCUS MARKETS or Magic Compass?
Both FOCUS MARKETS and Magic Compass hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FOCUS MARKETS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FOCUS MARKETS and Magic Compass?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FOCUS MARKETS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do FOCUS MARKETS and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FOCUS MARKETS lists CFDs on currency pairs, indices, commodities, stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FOCUS MARKETS or Magic Compass?
FOCUS MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.