1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FIBO Group vs OPOLO Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FIBO Group (FIBO Group, Ltd) and OPOLO Wallet (OPOLO SARL) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- FIBO Group 6D Score
- 3.2
- OPOLO Wallet 6D Score
- 3.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
OPOLO Wallet outranks FIBO Group by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.6 vs 3.2)
On supervisory breadth, FIBO Group holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas OPOLO Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FIBO Group | OPOLO Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.2 | 3.6 | +0.4 | OPOLO Wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.5 | +0.5 | OPOLO Wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.3 | 3.5 | +1.2 | OPOLO Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 3.7 | +0.3 | FIBO Group |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FIBO Group vs OPOLO Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FIBO Group | OPOLO Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FIBO Group, Ltd | OPOLO SARL |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 29 Agias Zonis, 1st Floor, 3027, Limassol, Cyprus | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX (60 currency pairs), precious metals (gold and silver), cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, Zcash, Dash and Monero), CFDs | Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Spanish, Italian, Arabic, Polish, English, German, Russian | Chinese (Simplified), English, Russian, Other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FIBO Group and OPOLO Wallet against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FIBO Group vs OPOLO Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FIBO Group or OPOLO Wallet?
Both FIBO Group and OPOLO Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FIBO Group maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas OPOLO Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FIBO Group and OPOLO Wallet?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FIBO Group records an Overall Score of 3.2 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 2.3, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with OPOLO Wallet at 3.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.5, Brand: 3.5, Market Influence: 3.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do FIBO Group and OPOLO Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FIBO Group lists FX (60 currency pairs), precious metals (gold and silver), cryptocurrencies (Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin, Zcash, Dash and Monero), CFDs with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while OPOLO Wallet lists Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FIBO Group or OPOLO Wallet?
FIBO Group carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while OPOLO Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.