1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
EXT vs INPAY: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of EXT (EXT LTD) and INPAY (Inpay A/S) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- EXT 6D Score
- 5.6
- INPAY 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
EXT outranks INPAY by +0.6 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.6 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, EXT holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas INPAY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | EXT | INPAY | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.6 | 5.0 | +0.6 | EXT |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.3 | 5.0 | +0.7 | INPAY |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.7 | 5.0 | +0.7 | EXT |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: EXT vs INPAY
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | EXT | INPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | EXT LTD | Inpay A/S |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 28 Oktovriou, 365 Vashiotis Seafront Building 3107, Limassol, Cyprus | Kalvebod Brygge 45, 1560 Copenhagen V, Denmark |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Currencies, metals, futures, options, funds, bonds, stocks, ETFs | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare EXT and INPAY against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: EXT vs INPAY
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: EXT or INPAY?
Both EXT and INPAY hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, EXT maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas INPAY maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (DFSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between EXT and INPAY?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), EXT records an Overall Score of 5.6 (Risk & Licensing: 4.3, Brand: 5.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with INPAY at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do EXT and INPAY differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
EXT lists Currencies, metals, futures, options, funds, bonds, stocks, ETFs with execution software [MT4], while INPAY lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: EXT or INPAY?
EXT carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while INPAY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.