1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
ETO Markets vs Magic Compass: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ETO Markets (ETO Markets Limited) and Magic Compass (Magic Compass Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- ETO Markets 6D Score
- 8.0
- Magic Compass 6D Score
- 6.7
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ETO Markets outranks Magic Compass by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 6.7)
On supervisory breadth, ETO Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Magic Compass holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | ETO Markets | Magic Compass | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 8.0 | 6.7 | +1.3 | ETO Markets |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 8.0 | 4.2 | +3.8 | ETO Markets |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 6.8 | +1.2 | ETO Markets |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 8.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ETO Markets |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: ETO Markets vs Magic Compass
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | ETO Markets | Magic Compass |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ETO Markets Limited | Magic Compass Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | F20, 1st Floor, Eden Plaza, Eden Island, Seychelles | :Sarlo 9, Ayios Athanasios, 4106 Limassol, Cyprus |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | International online trading platform for a wide range of currency pairs, commodities, energy and stock index derivatives | Forex, metals, spot index, vitality |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English, French, the source mentions multiple countries but does not name additional languages. | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare ETO Markets and Magic Compass against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: ETO Markets vs Magic Compass
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ETO Markets or Magic Compass?
Both ETO Markets and Magic Compass hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ETO Markets maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Magic Compass maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ETO Markets and Magic Compass?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ETO Markets records an Overall Score of 8.0 (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Magic Compass at 6.7 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.2, Brand: 6.8, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do ETO Markets and Magic Compass differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
ETO Markets lists International online trading platform for a wide range of currency pairs, commodities, energy and stock index derivatives with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Magic Compass lists Forex, metals, spot index, vitality with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ETO Markets or Magic Compass?
ETO Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Magic Compass carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.