1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Deex vs Quppy Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Deex (Deex) and Quppy Wallet (Quppy Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Deex 6D Score
- 2.6
- Quppy Wallet 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Quppy Wallet outranks Deex by +0.4 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 2.6)
On supervisory breadth, Deex holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Quppy Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Deex | Quppy Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.6 | 3.0 | +0.4 | Quppy Wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.5 | 3.0 | +0.5 | Quppy Wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Quppy Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.7 | 3.0 | +0.3 | Quppy Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.6 | 3.0 | +0.4 | Quppy Wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Deex vs Quppy Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Deex | Quppy Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Deex | Quppy Wallet |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | EE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Trading | Transfers, digital wallets, asset management, cryptocurrency |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Deex and Quppy Wallet against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Deex vs Quppy Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Deex or Quppy Wallet?
Both Deex and Quppy Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Deex maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Quppy Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Deex and Quppy Wallet?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Deex records an Overall Score of 2.6 (Risk & Licensing: 2.5, Brand: 2.7, Market Influence: 2.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Quppy Wallet at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Deex and Quppy Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Deex lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Quppy Wallet lists Transfers, digital wallets, asset management, cryptocurrency with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Deex or Quppy Wallet?
Deex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Quppy Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.