1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Global vs ING: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Global (Decode Global Ltd) and ING (ING Groep) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Decode Global 6D Score
- 6.0
- ING 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Decode Global outranks ING by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Global holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ING holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Global | ING | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Decode Global |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Global vs ING
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Global | ING |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Global Ltd | ING Groep |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | BaFin: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Land # 11, Yumiwork, Lolam building, OD22/021, Kumul Hwy, Port Vila, Vanuatu | 60 Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8HPE C 2 R 8 H P UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese (Simplified), Vietnamese, English, Thai | Dutch, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Global and ING against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Global vs ING
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Global or ING?
Decode Global holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Decode Global maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (VFSC, ASIC, SVG FSA, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ING maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BaFin) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Global and ING?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Global records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with ING at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Decode Global and ING differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Global lists Cryptocurrencies, Precious metals, Stock indices, Energies, Currencies with execution software [MT4, MT5], while ING lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Global or ING?
Decode Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ING carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.