1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Crypto Brokers vs SM-INVEST: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Crypto Brokers (Crypto Brokers OÜ) and SM-INVEST (Scope Markets Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Crypto Brokers 6D Score
- 3.0
- SM-INVEST 6D Score
- 6.3
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
SM-INVEST outranks Crypto Brokers by +3.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.3 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Crypto Brokers holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SM-INVEST holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Crypto Brokers | SM-INVEST | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 6.3 | +3.3 | SM-INVEST |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | SM-INVEST |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | SM-INVEST |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 6.7 | +3.7 | SM-INVEST |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | SM-INVEST |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Crypto Brokers vs SM-INVEST
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Crypto Brokers | SM-INVEST |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Crypto Brokers OÜ | Scope Markets Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Laeva 2, Tallinn, 10111, Estonia | 6160, Park Avenue, Buttonwood Bay, Lower Flat Office Space Front, Belize City |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX (can trading more than 30 currency pairs), indices, energy, metals, stocks and cryptocurrencies |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Telegram Messenger, Telegram | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, Arabic, Vietnamese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Crypto Brokers and SM-INVEST against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Crypto Brokers vs SM-INVEST
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Crypto Brokers or SM-INVEST?
Crypto Brokers holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Crypto Brokers maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB), Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SM-INVEST maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Financial Services Commission) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Crypto Brokers and SM-INVEST?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Crypto Brokers records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with SM-INVEST at 6.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 6.7, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Crypto Brokers and SM-INVEST differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Crypto Brokers lists general financial services with execution software [Telegram Messenger, Telegram], while SM-INVEST lists FX (can trading more than 30 currency pairs), indices, energy, metals, stocks and cryptocurrencies with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Crypto Brokers or SM-INVEST?
Crypto Brokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SM-INVEST carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.