1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Common vs ING: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Common (Common) and ING (ING Groep) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Common 6D Score
- 2.0
- ING 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ING outranks Common by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Common holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ING holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Common | ING | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ING |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ING |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | ING |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ING |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | ING |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Common vs ING
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Common | ING |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Common | ING Groep |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | BaFin: Not supplied |
| Registered Domicile / Address | EE | 60 Threadneedle Street London EC2R 8HPE C 2 R 8 H P UNITED KINGDOM |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | decentralised trading, privacy protection, yield aggregation, cross-chain asset management | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Dutch, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Common and ING against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Common vs ING
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Common or ING?
ING holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Common maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ING maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (BaFin) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Common and ING?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Common records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with ING at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Common and ING differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Common lists decentralised trading, privacy protection, yield aggregation, cross-chain asset management with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ING lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Common or ING?
Common carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ING carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.