1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Coinhouse vs iExec: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Coinhouse (Coinhouse SAS) and iExec (iExec) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Coinhouse 6D Score
- 5.0
- iExec 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Coinhouse outranks iExec by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Coinhouse holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas iExec holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Coinhouse | iExec | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Coinhouse |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Coinhouse |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Coinhouse |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Coinhouse |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Coinhouse vs iExec
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Coinhouse | iExec |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Coinhouse SAS | iExec |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | FR | FR |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | calculate |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Coinhouse and iExec against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Coinhouse vs iExec
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Coinhouse or iExec?
Both Coinhouse and iExec hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Coinhouse maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas iExec maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Coinhouse and iExec?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Coinhouse records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with iExec at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Coinhouse and iExec differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Coinhouse lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while iExec lists calculate with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Coinhouse or iExec?
Coinhouse carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while iExec carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.