1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CIM Bank vs Common: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CIM Bank (CIM Bank) and Common (Common) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- CIM Bank 6D Score
- 5.0
- Common 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CIM Bank outranks Common by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CIM Bank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Common holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CIM Bank | Common | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CIM Bank |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CIM Bank |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | CIM Bank |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CIM Bank |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | CIM Bank |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CIM Bank vs Common
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CIM Bank | Common |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CIM Bank | Common |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FINMA: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Rue Merle-d'Aubigné 16, 1207 Geneva, Switzerland | EE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex | decentralised trading, privacy protection, yield aggregation, cross-chain asset management |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CIM Bank and Common against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CIM Bank vs Common
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CIM Bank or Common?
CIM Bank holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, CIM Bank maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Common maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CIM Bank and Common?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CIM Bank records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Common at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do CIM Bank and Common differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CIM Bank lists Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex with execution software [MT4], while Common lists decentralised trading, privacy protection, yield aggregation, cross-chain asset management with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CIM Bank or Common?
CIM Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Common carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.