1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Chromia vs Coinhaven: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Chromia (ChromaWay AB) and Coinhaven (Coinhaven) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- Chromia 6D Score
- 5.0
- Coinhaven 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Chromia and Coinhaven are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Chromia holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Coinhaven holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Chromia | Coinhaven | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Chromia vs Coinhaven
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Chromia | Coinhaven |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | ChromaWay AB | Coinhaven |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | International | EE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Chromia and Coinhaven against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Chromia vs Coinhaven
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Chromia or Coinhaven?
Both Chromia and Coinhaven hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Chromia maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Coinhaven maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Chromia and Coinhaven?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Chromia records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Coinhaven at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Chromia and Coinhaven differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Chromia lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Coinhaven lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Chromia or Coinhaven?
Chromia carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Coinhaven carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.