1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Change vs GS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Change (Change) and GS (The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Change 6D Score
- 5.0
- GS 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 2
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Change and GS are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Change holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas GS holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Change | GS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | GS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Change vs GS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Change | GS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Change | The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | AFM: Not suppliedEstonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB): #FVT000072 | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | EE | United States New York State New York City Manhattan West Street 200 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | commercial banking, asset management, investment banking, investment management, financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Change and GS against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Change vs GS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Change or GS?
Both Change and GS hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Change maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (AFM, Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas GS maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S. Fed), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (U.S. OCC)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Change and GS?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Change records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with GS at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Change and GS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Change lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while GS lists commercial banking, asset management, investment banking, investment management, financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Change or GS?
Change carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while GS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.