Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Change vs element36: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Change (Change) and element36 (element36) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

Change 6D Score
5.0
element36 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: change-vs-element36

Change outranks element36 by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, Change holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas element36 holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightChangeelement36Score DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.02.0+3.0Change
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.02.0+3.0Change
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.01.0+1.0Change
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Change
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.02.0+3.0Change

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Change vs element36

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Change vs element36
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Change and element36.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeChangeelement36
Primary Legal NameChangeelement36
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressEECH
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Change and element36 against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Change vs element36

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Change or element36?

Change holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, Change maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (AFM, Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas element36 maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Change and element36?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Change records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with element36 at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Change and element36 differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Change lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while element36 lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Change or element36?

Change carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while element36 carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Change vs element36 (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger