1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Capex vs Mahadana: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Capex (JME Financial Services (Pty) Ltd) and Mahadana (PT. Mahadana Asta Berjangka) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- Capex 6D Score
- 6.5
- Mahadana 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 3 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Capex outranks Mahadana by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Capex holds 3 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 3 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Mahadana holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Capex | Mahadana | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.5 | 5.0 | +1.5 | Capex |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Capex |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 5.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Capex |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.7 | 5.0 | +1.7 | Capex |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 5.0 | +2.0 | Capex |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Capex vs Mahadana
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Capex | Mahadana |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | JME Financial Services (Pty) Ltd | PT. Mahadana Asta Berjangka |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 3 regulated / 3 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Suite 10, 21 Lighthouse Rd 201 Beacon Rock, Umhlanga Rocks, Kwa-Zulu Natal, 4320, South Africa | AXA Tower, 32nd & 29th Floor, Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12940 Graha Aktiva 9th Floor, Jln. HR Rasuna Said, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12950 Jl. Nusa Indah I No.56, Pontianak City, West Kalimantan 78117 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex, Currency Pairs, Indices, Bonds, ETFs, Commodities, Mixed Assets and Cryptocurrencies, ETFs, Mixed Assets. trading assets | FX, London gold, stock-index futures |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Italian, Arabic, Vietnamese, English, German | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Capex and Mahadana against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Capex vs Mahadana
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Capex or Mahadana?
Capex holds more active regulated filings (3 vs 1). Specifically, Capex maintains 3 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC, CNMV, FSCA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Mahadana maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Capex and Mahadana?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Capex records an Overall Score of 6.5 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.7, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0), compared with Mahadana at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Capex and Mahadana differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Capex lists Forex, Currency Pairs, Indices, Bonds, ETFs, Commodities, Mixed Assets and Cryptocurrencies, ETFs, Mixed Assets. trading assets with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Mahadana lists FX, London gold, stock-index futures with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Capex or Mahadana?
Capex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Mahadana carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.