1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BingX vs CIM Bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BingX (BingX) and CIM Bank (CIM Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- BingX 6D Score
- 6.0
- CIM Bank 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
BingX outranks CIM Bank by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, BingX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CIM Bank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BingX | CIM Bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | BingX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | BingX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | BingX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | BingX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BingX vs CIM Bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BingX | CIM Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | BingX | CIM Bank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FINMA: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Mäealuse tn 3a/5, Mustamäe linnaosa, Tallinn, Harju maakond, 12619 | Rue Merle-d'Aubigné 16, 1207 Geneva, Switzerland |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products | Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, German, Spanish, French, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, and more than ten widely used international languages in total | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BingX and CIM Bank against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BingX vs CIM Bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BingX or CIM Bank?
Both BingX and CIM Bank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, BingX maintains 4 total recorded filing(s) (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), ASIC, Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (RAB / MTR Register)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CIM Bank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BingX and CIM Bank?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BingX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CIM Bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do BingX and CIM Bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BingX lists Crypto spot trading, Derivatives contracts, Investment products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CIM Bank lists Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BingX or CIM Bank?
BingX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CIM Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.