1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
AirGap wallet vs Kriptomat Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of AirGap wallet (AirGap wallet) and Kriptomat Wallet (Kriptomat OÜ) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- AirGap wallet 6D Score
- 3.0
- Kriptomat Wallet 6D Score
- 3.1
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Kriptomat Wallet outranks AirGap wallet by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (3.1 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, AirGap wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Kriptomat Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | AirGap wallet | Kriptomat Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.1 | +0.1 | Kriptomat Wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | AirGap wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.1 | +0.1 | Kriptomat Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 3.2 | +0.2 | Kriptomat Wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: AirGap wallet vs Kriptomat Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | AirGap wallet | Kriptomat Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | AirGap wallet | Kriptomat OÜ |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Switzerland Canton of Zug | -- |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | trading, crypto-asset management, delegation, staking support | Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers |
| Execution Software & Terminals | AirGap Wallet | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | German, Estonian, English, Spanish, French, Croatian, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Serbian, Swedish, Turkish, Czech, Greek, Bulgarian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare AirGap wallet and Kriptomat Wallet against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: AirGap wallet vs Kriptomat Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: AirGap wallet or Kriptomat Wallet?
Both AirGap wallet and Kriptomat Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, AirGap wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Kriptomat Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between AirGap wallet and Kriptomat Wallet?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), AirGap wallet records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Kriptomat Wallet at 3.1 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.1, Market Influence: 3.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do AirGap wallet and Kriptomat Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
AirGap wallet lists trading, crypto-asset management, delegation, staking support with execution software [AirGap Wallet], while Kriptomat Wallet lists Digital asset management, Trade execution, Transfers with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: AirGap wallet or Kriptomat Wallet?
AirGap wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Kriptomat Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.
