1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
4xhub vs CIM Bank: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 4xhub (4xhub) and CIM Bank (CIM Bank) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected investment firm and financial institution records: Continental Europe
- 4xhub 6D Score
- 5.0
- CIM Bank 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
4xhub and CIM Bank are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, 4xhub holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CIM Bank holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 4xhub | CIM Bank | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 4xhub vs CIM Bank
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 4xhub | CIM Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 4xhub | CIM Bank |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FINMA: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Amathoundas Avenue 210, Energy House Block A, Office 1, Pyrgos 4534 Limassol | Rue Merle-d'Aubigné 16, 1207 Geneva, Switzerland |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX and CFDs on indices, commodities and cryptocurrencies | Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 4xhub and CIM Bank against other regulated peers in our selected investment firm and financial institution records: continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 4xhub vs CIM Bank
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 4xhub or CIM Bank?
Both 4xhub and CIM Bank hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 4xhub maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CIM Bank maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 4xhub and CIM Bank?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 4xhub records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with CIM Bank at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do 4xhub and CIM Bank differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
4xhub lists FX and CFDs on indices, commodities and cryptocurrencies with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CIM Bank lists Asset management, Currency pairs, Custody, Forex with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 4xhub or CIM Bank?
4xhub carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CIM Bank carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.