1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
31Third vs Jellyverse: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 31Third (31Third) and Jellyverse (Jellyverse) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- 31Third 6D Score
- 2.0
- Jellyverse 6D Score
- 2.1
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Jellyverse outranks 31Third by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.1 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, 31Third holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Jellyverse holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 31Third | Jellyverse | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.1 | +0.1 | Jellyverse |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.1 | +0.1 | Jellyverse |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.1 | +0.1 | Jellyverse |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.1 | +0.1 | Jellyverse |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 31Third vs Jellyverse
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 31Third | Jellyverse |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 31Third | Jellyverse |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Trading |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 31Third and Jellyverse against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 31Third vs Jellyverse
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 31Third or Jellyverse?
Both 31Third and Jellyverse hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 31Third maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Jellyverse maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 31Third and Jellyverse?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 31Third records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Jellyverse at 2.1 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.1, Brand: 2.1, Market Influence: 2.1, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do 31Third and Jellyverse differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
31Third lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Jellyverse lists Trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 31Third or Jellyverse?
31Third carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Jellyverse carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.