1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
31Third vs Emerald Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 31Third (31Third) and Emerald Wallet (Emerald Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- 31Third 6D Score
- 2.0
- Emerald Wallet 6D Score
- 2.3
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Emerald Wallet outranks 31Third by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.3 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, 31Third holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Emerald Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 31Third | Emerald Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.3 | +0.3 | Emerald Wallet |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.4 | +0.4 | Emerald Wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | Emerald Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.3 | +0.3 | Emerald Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.4 | +0.4 | Emerald Wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 31Third vs Emerald Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 31Third | Emerald Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 31Third | Emerald Wallet |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands | CH |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Key-secure crypto vault, Ledger hardware wallet integration, and broad stablecoin support |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 31Third and Emerald Wallet against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 31Third vs Emerald Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 31Third or Emerald Wallet?
Both 31Third and Emerald Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 31Third maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Emerald Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 31Third and Emerald Wallet?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 31Third records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Emerald Wallet at 2.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.4, Brand: 2.3, Market Influence: 2.4, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do 31Third and Emerald Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
31Third lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Emerald Wallet lists Key-secure crypto vault, Ledger hardware wallet integration, and broad stablecoin support with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 31Third or Emerald Wallet?
31Third carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Emerald Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.