1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
2525 Ventures BV vs CMX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 2525 Ventures BV (2525 Ventures BV) and CMX (CMX Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- 2525 Ventures BV 6D Score
- 5.0
- CMX 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
2525 Ventures BV and CMX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, 2525 Ventures BV holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas CMX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 2525 Ventures BV | CMX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | 2525 Ventures BV |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | CMX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | 2525 Ventures BV |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | 2525 Ventures BV |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 2525 Ventures BV vs CMX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 2525 Ventures BV | CMX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 2525 Ventures BV | CMX Markets |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Kennemerplein 6 14de etage, 2011 MJ, Haarlem | Republic of Moldova, mun. Bălți, str. Dostoevschi, nr.。 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | FX brokerage |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 2525 Ventures BV and CMX against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 2525 Ventures BV vs CMX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 2525 Ventures BV or CMX?
Both 2525 Ventures BV and CMX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, 2525 Ventures BV maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas CMX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 2525 Ventures BV and CMX?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 2525 Ventures BV records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with CMX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do 2525 Ventures BV and CMX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
2525 Ventures BV lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while CMX lists FX brokerage with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 2525 Ventures BV or CMX?
2525 Ventures BV carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while CMX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.