Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Sucden vs SwissBorg: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Sucden (Sucden Financial Limited) and SwissBorg (SwissBorg SA) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

Sucden 6D Score
5.0
SwissBorg 6D Score
4.0
Regulated Licences
2 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: sucden-vs-swissborg

Sucden outranks SwissBorg by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)

On supervisory breadth, Sucden holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SwissBorg holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightSucdenSwissBorgScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.04.0+1.0Sucden
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.04.0+2.0Sucden
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Sucden vs SwissBorg

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Sucden vs SwissBorg
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Sucden and SwissBorg.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeSucdenSwissBorg
Primary Legal NameSucden Financial LimitedSwissBorg SA
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressSucden Financial Limited Plantation Place South 60 Great Tower Street EC3R 5AZ United KingdomRue du Grand-Chêne 8, Lausanne, Vaud 1003, Switzerland
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMetals (base metals, precious metals, steel, iron ore), foreign exchange (FX), soft and agricultural commodities, energy, fixed incomeMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Russian, Chinese, and other languagesEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Sucden and SwissBorg against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Sucden vs SwissBorg

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Sucden or SwissBorg?

Sucden holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 1). Specifically, Sucden maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (SFC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SwissBorg maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB), AMF) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Sucden and SwissBorg?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Sucden records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with SwissBorg at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).

How do Sucden and SwissBorg differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Sucden lists Metals (base metals, precious metals, steel, iron ore), foreign exchange (FX), soft and agricultural commodities, energy, fixed income with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SwissBorg lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Sucden or SwissBorg?

Sucden carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SwissBorg carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Sucden vs SwissBorg (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger