1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
INPAY vs PatronFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of INPAY (Inpay A/S) and PatronFX (Forex TB Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe
- INPAY 6D Score
- 5.0
- PatronFX 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
INPAY and PatronFX are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, INPAY holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PatronFX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | INPAY | PatronFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | PatronFX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | INPAY |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | INPAY |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: INPAY vs PatronFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | INPAY | PatronFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Inpay A/S | Forex TB Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Kalvebod Brygge 45, 1560 Copenhagen V, Denmark | Lemesou Avenue 71, 2nd Floor, 2121, Aglantzia, Nicosia, Cyprus. |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare INPAY and PatronFX against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: INPAY vs PatronFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: INPAY or PatronFX?
Both INPAY and PatronFX hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, INPAY maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (DFSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PatronFX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (CYSEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between INPAY and PatronFX?
In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), INPAY records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PatronFX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do INPAY and PatronFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
INPAY lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PatronFX lists general financial services with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: INPAY or PatronFX?
INPAY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PatronFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.