Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Change vs MagnetFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Change (Change) and MagnetFX (MagnetFX) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

Change 6D Score
5.0
MagnetFX 6D Score
6.5
Regulated Licences
2 vs 2
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: change-vs-magnetfx

MagnetFX outranks Change by +1.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.5 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Change holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MagnetFX holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightChangeMagnetFXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight2.04.0+2.0MagnetFX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.5+1.5MagnetFX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Change vs MagnetFX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Change vs MagnetFX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Change and MagnetFX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeChangeMagnetFX
Primary Legal NameChangeMagnetFX
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressEESona Topas Tower Lt. 18 Suite 1804 Jl. General Sudirman No. Kav. 26 DKI. Jakarta, 12920, Indonesia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesForeign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Change and MagnetFX against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Change vs MagnetFX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Change or MagnetFX?

Both Change and MagnetFX hold 2 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Change maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (AFM, Estonian Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU / RAB)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MagnetFX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (ICDX, ICDX) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Change and MagnetFX?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Change records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with MagnetFX at 6.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.5, Brand: 6.5, Market Influence: 6.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do Change and MagnetFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Change lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MagnetFX lists Foreign exchange, gold, silver, crude oil, US index with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Change or MagnetFX?

Change carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MagnetFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Change vs MagnetFX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger