Skip to content
Euro Firm Ledger
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Bity vs MuxCap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Bity (The Bity Group SA) and MuxCap (MuxCap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across Continental Europe

Bity 6D Score
2.0
MuxCap 6D Score
1.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: bity-vs-muxcap

Bity outranks MuxCap by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, Bity holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MuxCap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightBityMuxCapScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.01.0+1.0Bity
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.01.0+1.0Bity
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.01.0+1.0Bity
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.01.2+0.8Bity

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Bity vs MuxCap

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Bity vs MuxCap
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Bity and MuxCap.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeBityMuxCap
Primary Legal NameThe Bity Group SAMuxCap
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
FINMA: Not supplied
None on file
Registered Domicile / AddressRue des Usines 44, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland-
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMulti-asset financial servicesForex
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Bity and MuxCap against other regulated peers in our investment firms and financial institutions headquartered across continental europe slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Bity vs MuxCap

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Bity or MuxCap?

Bity holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Bity maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FINMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MuxCap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Bity and MuxCap?

In Euro Firm Ledger's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Bity records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with MuxCap at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.2, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do Bity and MuxCap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Bity lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MuxCap lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Bity or MuxCap?

Bity carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MuxCap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Bity vs MuxCap (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | Euro Firm Ledger